# week4 .pdf

### File information

Original filename:

**week4.pdf**

This PDF 1.5 document has been generated by LaTeX with hyperref package / pdfTeX-1.40.13, and has been sent on pdf-archive.com on 20/02/2016 at 18:01, from IP address 81.164.x.x.
The current document download page has been viewed 415 times.

File size: 149 KB (3 pages).

Privacy: public file

### Share on social networks

### Link to this file download page

### Document preview

Assignment Week 4: An SDP based randomized algorithm for

the Correlation Clustering problem

The objective of this exercise is to design an algorithm for the correlation clustering problem. Given an

undirected graph G = (V, E) without loops, for each edge e = {i, j} ∈ E there are two non-negative

numbers we+ , we− ≥ 0 representing how similar and dissimilar the nodes i and j are, respectively. For

S ⊆ V , let E(S) be the set of edges with both endpoints in S, that is, E(S) = {{i, j} ∈ E : i, j ∈ S}.

The goal is to find a partition S of V that maximizes

X

X

f (S) =

we+ +

we− .

(1)

S∈S:e∈E(S)

e∈E\∪S∈S E(S)

In words, the objective is to find a partition that maximizes the total similarity inside each set of the

partition plus the dissimilarity between nodes in different sets of the partition.

Consider the following simple algorithm:

Algorithm 1

Let S1 = {{i} : i ∈ V } the partition that considers each vertex as a single cluster, and S2 = {V }, that

is every vertex in the same cluster. Compute the values f (S1 ) and f (S2 ) of these two partitions, and

output the best among this two.

• Question 1. Compute the values f (S1 ), f (S2 ) in terms of the weights w− and w+ .

For S1 there are no edges in any E(S) with S = {i} ∈ S1 , while for S2 all edges are in E(V ). So

we find

X

f (S1 ) =

we− ,

e∈E

f (S2 ) =

X

we+ .

(2)

e∈E

• Question 2. Conclude that previous algorithm is a 1/2-approximation.

We have the following bound for any S:

X

X

f (S) ≤

we+ +

we− = f (S1 ) + f (S2 ) ≤ 2 max(f (S1 ), f (S2 )) ,

e

(3)

e

and thus also for the optimal S ∗

max(f (S1 ), f (S2 )) ≥ 1/2f (S ∗ ) = 1/2 OPT ,

(4)

so we have 1/2-approximation.

Let B = {e` : ` ∈ {1, 2, . . . , n}} be the canonical basis in Rn , where n = |V |. For every vertex

i ∈ V there is a vector xi that is equal to ek if node i is assigned to cluster k. Consider the

following program:

X

+

−

max

w{i,j}

xi · xj + w{i,j}

(1 − xi · xj ) : xi ∈ B, ∀i ∈ V .

(5)

{i,j}∈E

• Question 3. Explain why this program is a formulation of the correlation clustering problem.

We have two cases. Either i and j belong to the same cluster, or either two different clusters. In

the first case, there is some cluster k so that both i and j belong to k. We have xi = xj = ek and

xi · xj = 1. Also e = {i, j} ∈ E(Sk ). The edge e then contributes we+ to the first term of both

objective (1) and objective (5). In the second case we have xi · xj = 0, since different basis vectors

1

are orthogonal, as well as e ∈ E \ ∪E(S) and the edge e contributes we− to the second term of

both objective (1) and objective (5). It follows that objective (1) and objective (5) are identical.

The formulation is relaxed to obtain the following vector program:

X

+

−

max

w{i,j}

vi · vj + w{i,j}

(1 − vi · vj )

.

(6)

{i,j}∈E

subject to

vi · vi = 1 ,

∀i ∈ V,

vi · vj ≥ 0 ,

∀i, j ∈ V,

n

vi ∈ R ,

(7)

∀i ∈ V .

Consider the following algorithm:

Algorithm SDP

Solve the the previous relaxation to obtain vectors {vi : i ∈ V }, with objective value equal to

Z. Draw independently two random hyperplanes with normals r1 and r2 . This determines four

regions,

R1 = {i ∈ V : r1 · vi ≥ 0 and r2 · vi ≥ 0},

R2 = {i ∈ V : r1 · vi ≥ 0 and r2 · vi < 0},

(8)

R3 = {i ∈ V : r1 · vi < 0 and r2 · vi ≥ 0},

R4 = {i ∈ V : r1 · vi < 0 and r2 · vi < 0},

and output the partition R = {R1 , R2 , R3 , R4 }.

In the following, the goal is to analyse this algorithm, and to prove that it is a 3/4-approximation.

• Question 4. Let X{i,j} be the random variable that is equal to 1 if the vectors vi and vj lie on the

same side of the two random hyperplanes, and zero otherwise. Using an argument similar to the

2

one used for Max-Cut, prove that Prob(X{i,j} = 1) = 1 − 1/πθ{i,j} , where θ{i,j} = arccos(vi ·vj )

is the angle between vectors vi and vj .

As in the lectures the change that one random hyperplane separates the two vectors is θ{i,j} /π,

so the change that one hyperplane does not separate them is 1 − θ{i,j} /π. Since the hyperplanes

are chosen independently the change that neither of them separates them is

(1 − θ{i,j} /π)2 .

• Question 5. Let f (R) =

P

{i,j}∈E

(9)

+

−

w{i,j}

X{i,j} + w{i,j}

(1 − X{i,j} ) the value of the partition R,

and denote g(θ) = (1 − θ/π)2 the probability function computed before. Prove that the expected

value of f (R), denoted by E(f (R)), is

X

+

−

w{i,j}

g(θ{i,j} ) + w{i,j}

(1 − g(θ{i,j} )).

(10)

{i,j}∈E

We have immediately

E(f (R)) =

X

+

−

w{i,j}

E(X{i,j} ) + w{i,j}

(1 − E(X{i,j} ))

{i,j}∈E

=

X

+

−

w{i,j}

g(θ{i,j} ) + w{i,j}

(1 − g(θ{i,j} )).

{i,j}∈E

The following lemma will be helpful to conclude the analysis (You don’t need to prove it.)

Lemma. For θ ∈ [0, π/2], g(θ) ≥ 3/4 cos(θ) and 1 − g(θ) ≥ 3/4(1 − cos(θ)).

2

(11)

• Question 6. Using the lemma conclude that E(f (R)) ≥ 3/4 Z, and that the algorithm is a 3/4approximation.

Using Q5 and the lemma we find:

X

+

−

E(f (R)) =

w{i,j}

g(θ{i,j} ) + w{i,j}

(1 − g(θ{i,j} ))

{i,j}∈E

≥ 3/4

X

+

−

w{i,j}

cos(θ{i,j} ) + w{i,j}

(1 − cos(θ{i,j} )) = 3/4 Z ≥ 3/4 OPT ,

(12)

{i,j}∈E

so that

E(f (R)) ≥ 3/4OPT .

3

(13)

### Link to this page

#### Permanent link

Use the permanent link to the download page to share your document on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, or directly with a contact by e-Mail, Messenger, Whatsapp, Line..

#### Short link

Use the short link to share your document on Twitter or by text message (SMS)

#### HTML Code

Copy the following HTML code to share your document on a Website or Blog